America was built on constitutional bedrock: your vote

The men who designed the Constitution had specific corrections they wanted to make to the British monarchical system they had grown up with. In addition, they recognized the recent religious and political history of Europe and acknowledged the diverse community the colonies had become.

So they built a structure of checks and balances that required broad consensus to work smoothly, starting with the idea “We the People…”

They designed the U.S. Constitution to encourage all factions to have a say, and to be heard. This concept was enshrined in the First Amendment. America does not need a Tahrir Square nor a Velvet Revolution—its people’s right to protest is already written into the Constitution. All public officials are sworn to protect the Constitution, by an oath the Founding Fathers put in the Constitution.

But how does the average person protect and defend the Constitution? The simple answer is, by voting.

The right to vote is the badge of citizenship. Voting is such an extraordinarily valuable part of the American system that there are those who try to suppress the vote, thus weakening our constitutional protections. We are all too familiar with the long history and many devices, even violence, used in America after the Civil War to deny African American citizens the vote and hence the opportunity to participate in public life.

The violence at Selma, Alabama’s Edmund Pettus Bridge on “Bloody Sunday” (March 7, 1965), shocked the wider American conscience and contributed to the swift passage of 1965’s Civil Rights Act, signed into law on Aug. 6.

Seven years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court seriously weakened those 1965 protections. Its Shelby County v. Holder decision meant that states with histories of racial discrimination were no longer required to pre-clear changes in voting with the federal government.

Unsurprisingly, that decision led to the enactment of a host of obvious voter-suppression tactics such as purging voter rolls, use-it-or-lose-it rules, closing polling locations, restricting the hours of voting, instituting onerous voter-ID laws, limiting access to voting by mail, and other measures that disproportionately affect specific parts of the community.

This is not history, this is today.

In recent elections in Georgia and Texas, we have seen poll closures, malfunctioning machines, missing absentee ballots, and long lines. Even the Atlanta mayor had to vote in person because her absentee ballot never arrived.

Ninety percent of the polling places in Kentucky were closed, the highest percent being in Black and Brown neighborhoods. In that commonwealth’s largest city, there was only one polling station open for 616,523 registered voters, forcing long lines and exposure to COVID-19.

In Florida, voters passed a referendum to restore the right to vote for those who had a criminal record. The Republican-dominated legislature immediately turned around and created a poll tax requirement which the courts struck down.

In North Carolina, the courts ruled against a voter-ID requirement that the court said disadvantaged African Americans “with surgical precision.”

Your vote is so important that great measures are taken to deny it to you.

But in Virginia this year, the state legislature removed the photo-ID requirement, returning voter identification for the Nov. 3 election to its original 2014 requirements. The legislature eliminated the list of excuses for obtaining an absentee ballot. Now, you can easily request an absentee ballot at any time of the year. In the era of the coronavirus pandemic, this step is particularly helpful, because you will not be endangering the election officers at the precinct polling station, nor yourself.

The last great voter-suppression move, in fact, may be the administration’s threat to not fund the U.S. Postal Service. No post office, no vote-by-mail ballots.

Yes, voting is your badge of citizenship. Keep it polished.

David Reuther

This article was originally published in the Culpeper Star-Exponent and is republished here with the author’s consent.

What’s that sound?

So why did the Board of Supervisors call for special meeting earlier this week with less than 24 hours notice? Was there some reason it couldn’t have waited until their regular July 6th meeting?

Was it really to “discuss broadband services in Louisa County with Rappahannock Electrical Cooperative?” Since their own minutes, show the county had yet to respond to several letters REC sent to the county asking for a timely response to several questions, which as far as I can tell were never answered.

What happened was not a simple disagreement between the county and service provider, it’s was a situation where “there’s something happening here, but what it is ain’t exactly clear.” What is clear is that people are rejecting the board’s ideas.

They are tired of a government that is only interested in being the enforcers of crony capitalism. Where the inequality, and lack of opportunity we see today, is all about sustaining the structures of power. A situation not unlike the root causes behind the Black Lives Matters protests. And like BLM, the people of this county have lost faith in a government that doesn’t promote the common good.

The key to any successful social change is to discredit the ideas used to prop up the ruling class with alternative ideas and language. Once the old vocabulary looses it’s currency, the power elite are finished. Opening the way for voters to dismiss their minions and demand a government independent of, and not subservient to corporate power.

Of course people are free to think like Dan Braswell and dismiss these words as “inappropriate” and “delete them” from their minds, or they could say “It’s time we stop, Hey what’s that sound? Everybody look what’s going down.”

Jon Taylor

Originally published in the Central Virginian and published here with the permission of the author.

Should the U.S. Deport Illegal Immigrants?

To the editor:

In this time of change and corrections, sometimes our government needs a little help in order to help us.

Those stimulus checks, for instance. Last month, I went on the IRS.gov website to find out if mine was on the way to me, but the tool could not find my information. Each time I tried, it helpfully told me I needed to wait 24 hours before trying again. Also, basically, “Don’t bother to try telephoning.”

It turned out that my problem was the same as many people had, and it has been fixed, apparently. But some people have not received their money. Even if you did not need to file a tax return recently, news reports say you have until Oct. 15 to use the IRS.gov website to sign up for a check.

I don’t think we can blame this delay all on the IRS, since the agency has been forced more than once to reduce employees. But I hear that our Congresswoman, Abigail Spanberger, has led efforts to increase the number of workers available to get the payments out, and, according to reports, the IRS has hired 3,500 more people to do so. You would think it would be obvious that a government that “should run itself like a business” would want to make sure to take care of the arm that brings in the cash … and in this case, sends it out to us.

It sounds to me like Rep. Spanberger understands that, and has the drive and ability to see that the government fulfills its promises to us.

Sara Elder

Louisa

Originally published in the Central Virginian and published here with the permission of the author.

Water Board Should Be Replaced

To the editor:

I attended the James River Water Authority meeting last week. At the meeting in March in Louisa about 100 people came and 50 spoke against situating the water pumping station on top of Rassawek, the principal town of the Monacan Nation.

This project has been plagued with problems of mismanagement and has frittered away millions of our tax dollars. A pipeline was built before a permit for a pumping station was issued. Even a preschooler setting up her wooden train set knows that you must have a starting and ending point in order to determine the route in between

The archaeological consultant hired was found by the state to be unqualified to make recommendations after a whistleblower filed a complaint in October 2019 about destroying artifacts. I wonder when we will be reimbursed for the fees paid to that firm.

At the March meeting the JRWA board heard from local people, experts at Preservation Virginia and the Southern Environmental Law Center and, most important of all, the Monacan nation, the largest tribal community in the Commonwealth. All unanimously supported stopping the plan to destroy their historic capital of Rassawek and instead to choose any of several alternatives.

Then the Army Corps of Engineers invited public comments on the matter. Over 12,000 individuals and groups commented against the destruction of Rassawek. I went to the June meeting to ask the board how it feels to have 12,000 people unanimously tell you that you are wrong. I bet it feels pretty bad, and it should. The meeting was held in Fluvanna and despite being in the middle of a pandemic, no virtual option was offered. Only three people spoke and all opposed obliteration of sacred Monacan burials.

I was appalled when the attorney for the JRWA, Justin Curtis, admonished citizens for daring to exercise their First Amendment rights and criticize the record of the board. Our tax dollars are paying him to deride myself and others for braving the health risks of a pandemic to remind the board of what at least 12,050 people have already said to them. Mr. Curtis stands to gain financially no matter the course of this project, as he continues to bill us for his time. He accused citizens of being against development and the water pipeline, when that is not true. The way forward is simple: Build the pumping station in an alternate location. It will cost more now, but that is the fault of the board. If they had done it right, they would not be in a bad spot now. Still the board voted to continue on the same destructive path.

The JRWA has not been a good steward of the taxpayers’ money. They have not demonstrated empathy or respect for others’ cultural heritage. It is literally the very least we can do, literally to do nothing, to not disturb Rassawek. This board does not represent me. It does not represent Louisa or Fluvanna counties. According to the 2018 U.S. Census, both counties are composed of over 50 percent women, yet there is no woman on the board. Where are the women? For reasons stated above, I ask that each member of the JRWA board do one decent thing and resign, effective immediately. We will turn to our respective boards of supervisors and work with them to appoint a more representative, effective, and transparent JRWA board.

Aleta Strickland

Louisa

Originally published in the Central Virginian and published here with the permission of the author.

Misleading the Public

To the editor,

I write this letter sitting in my home. All events that I might have attended have been cancelled, even church services. The governor has closed schools across the Commonwealth for at least two weeks. We are in a national and international health crisis. Like many of you who are reading this, I am in the most vulnerable group – older and less healthy. I am fortunate to be retired so I don’t have to go out to work, like so many others including other seniors who are vulnerable.

I am very unhappy with how the administration and the federal government have responded to help keep us safe. They turned down test kits from the World Health Organization so we now don’t have enough kits to test our population as rapidly as we need to test. The CDC has been told not to publish coronavirus statistics, including deaths AND positive tests. Earlier presidents chose to fight the pandemics abroad (Ebola) before they got to America. Not this one and it has turned out to be a very short-sighted decision.

The president is actively trying to minimize the crisis and is not preparing the country to respond adequately. This decision places all of us in a great deal of danger. Why is the president so focused on minimizing this crisis? Because he wants to keep the stock market high and his hotels and resorts open for business. He is sacrificing the health and wellness of our citizens so he can “keep the numbers low.”

He is so shortsighted and incompetent that he thinks that misleading the public on this will solve the crisis instead of spreading the virus. He has rid himself of expert opinions and those brave enough to stand up and disagree with him so he’s left with his “gut” or a “hunch” to guide his policy on this. In this case and others, his “gut” is not a substitute for the actual scientific knowledge and a professional medical response.

Instead he has left to all of us individually and to the states to respond to this crisis on our own for the most part. It is inadequate. The federal government has a constitutional duty to respond to this with our resources (taxes that we all have paid). Trump has finally released those funds eight weeks into the contagion. Finally, Congress has shown some bipartisanship and will pass a virus relief bill and maybe the president will sign it. Hopefully, its not too little and too late.

Trump himself may not survive until November since he is shaking hands daily with infected people. He says he has been tested and the test is negative, but can we believe him after so much deception in his earlier reports. Sometimes I fear he will try to use this contagion as a ruse to cancel the November elections.

When we have elections, if you vote for Trump in the next election, you are a fool. You are placing all of us in real danger of sickness or death, or of having another crisis that he will not be competent to handle or tell the truth about to the American public . This represents very well the danger of putting a “business man”, and an incompetent one at that, in the white house who is only interested in profit and appearance, rather than the welfare of the American people.

If you don’t believe this is a crisis, I suggest you book a cruise or fly abroad for a vacation this spring. I hear there are some real bargains out there right now.

Joanna Hickman
Louisa Va

Editors Note: This letter appeared in the Central Virginian and appears here with permission of the author

Why McGuire Doesn’t Support Expanding Absentee Voting.

Why didn’t Delegate John McGuire vote for a bill that would expand absentee voting and make it easier for voters who are parents of young children, who work unpredictable schedules, and who don’t have a full-blown disability but have trouble standing for long periods? Republicans used to believe in democracy, but today some of them don’t seem to want everyone to vote.
 
Jen Wainright
 
Editor’s Note: this letter originally appeared in the Central Virginian, and has been re-posted here with the author’s permission.