Wrong vote on animal abuse bill

To the editor:

If you care about animals as much as I do, you may be glad to know that we have a new law in Virginia that will help protect our beloved companions from being abused in breeding situations and pet shops. The bipartisan bill, SB1412, was introduced by Republican Sen. Bill Stanley and passed the Senate 29-10 and the House of Delegates 67-28.

It is now a misdemeanor for anyone working with companion animals as a pet shop owner, dealer, breeder, or employee of these people to have a criminal record of animal cruelty, neglect or abandonment.

One would think that this law wouldn’t be controversial. After all, who would be in favor of animal abusers working with animals? Apparently, Del. John McGuire is. Our representative for the 56th istrict voted against this bill.

This makes me suspect that he is in the pocket of puppy mill breeders and the unethical dealers who sell these mistreated creatures. Hard to say, but whatever his reason, it can’t be a good one. It is a well-known fact that pet shops that sell puppies get their animals from puppy mills, which have a long record of horrific abuse. If you wonder why so many pet stores do not sell dogs or cats, or only provide space for animal rescue groups to support pet adoption, ask anyone working in animal rescue, animal control officers, or veterinarians. The one thing that would make this egislation stronger would be an outright ban on selling puppy mill dogs in Virginia. The fact that it does not is evidence of the strength of the puppy mill lobby.

There is nothing good about animal cruelty, and there is nothing good about McGuire’s refusal to support legislation aimed at stopping it. So far, on any piece of decent legislation – even bills patroned by members of his own party – John McGuire is batting zero.

Sincerely,
Claire Kaplan
Troy

Administrator’s Note: This letter was originally published in the Central Virginian newspaper and is reprinted here with the author’s permission.

Current supervisor has been an asset

To the editor:
I hear a lot about Supervisor Fitzgerald Barnes supporting business in Louisa. I would like to remind people that he pushed to get the Betty J. Queen Intergenerational Center funded, and the swimming pool, too. Those facilities and the programs they support are just as important to me as business development. Fitz works hard to better all aspects of life in Louisa.

Sue Rayburn
Louisa

Administrator’s Note: This letter was originally published in the Central Virginian newspaper and is reprinted here with the author’s permission.

Electing the competent requires knowing the candidates

The 2020 Presidential election was noted for its massive turnout of voters. President Biden received 81,268,924 votes, while former President Trump received 74,216,154. It appears the Republican party views the loss as the result of too many Democratic voters, and its solution is to swamp state legislatures with voter suppression measures.

One example of recent voter suppression was to create long lines at polls by closing rural polling places, then to make it illegal for poll workers to give water to those standing in line. There is no well-run, customer-friendly business anywhere that could perceive long lines as good customer service. Why would we want to discourage voter participation this way?

Indeed, across our nation courts are striking down the recent efforts of several Republican-dominated legislatures to create restrictive voting laws in their states. Virginia’s legislature, however, with its Democratic majority, is not following the voter-suppression mob. The election this November for all 100 seats in the House of Delegates will be enormously important in blocking voter-suppression efforts by the regressive Republican minority.

U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger’s win in the November 2020 election shows us that voters in the 7th Congressional District are looking for competence above party affiliation. She has proven again and again that she is willing to reach across the aisle to represent all residents in her district.

Here in Culpeper, the recent election for Clerk of the Circuit Court resulted in 71 percent of the vote going to the only candidate with the qualifications and experience for the job. Voters understood that ideological posturing alone was insufficient to qualify an individual to run this important constitutional office.

Even so, our local Republican committee’s recent actions indicate that it wants ideological candidates up and down the ballot. They have endorsed candidates for the four open non-partisan Town Council seats this November. Former Culpeper County Republican Committee Chair Jon Russell, running for the non-partisan position of Culpeper mayor, has himself been endorsed by Republican office holders, as well as the local committee. Again, is absolute party loyalty more important than what is best for Culpeper? Should a party demand that their chosen candidates agree to promote that party’s creed and uphold “other values?”

Yes, Virginia is changing. There are more Democratic candidates running for House of Delegates this year than ever before. In our area, Annette Hyde, the Democratic candidate for the 30th District, has been introducing herself around Culpeper, Orange, and Madison counties. Those county committees are hosting a fundraiser and rally for Hyde at the Lake of the Woods Community Center at 3 p.m. this Saturday, July 24. 

Rep. Spanberger will be the guest speaker. Attorney General Mark Herring will also be there, and other Virginia notables will offer video tributes. Culpeper’s independent-minded voters can get more information about how Annette would represent us in the House of Delegates at annetteservesva.com. Sign up for the fundraiser at to meet her and hear her ideas. In addition, concerned Culpeper citizens in the northern part of the county will want to educate themselves about 18th District challenger Doug Ward.

Yes, something is in the wind. There is a huge pool of voters from all sides of the political spectrum looking for competence. 

There are several highly qualified, intelligent, and independent Town Council candidates who have the best interests of the community at heart and who are not bound by regressive political creeds, party affiliation and endorsements. Voters understand that dogmatic posturing is not the same thing as governing effectively.

Educate yourselves about the candidates at all levels of the commonwealth and vote in your own best interests this November. 

David Reuther
Culpeper

This letter was previously published in the latest edition of the Culpeper Star*Exponent newspaper and is reprinted here with the author’s permission.

Why infrastructure matters

Infrastructure is more than highways and bridges anymore. In today’s world, it includes energy and water utilities, internet and cell phone service, health care, education, and the environment. It’s more complex and interrelated than it used to be.

Also, it’s more vulnerable to internal neglect as well as external attacks like the Texas power grid failure and the Colonial Pipeline ransom, respectively. Neglect of the former caused deaths and unnecessary hardship for Texas citizens. Tactical attacks on the latter caused inconvenience to East Coast states but also identified vulnerabilities to national security, to ourselves as well as those intending us harm.

These warning signs are obvious, or should be, to all elected representatives. Denial by Republicans, en masse, that there is a problem, or if there is then we should pay as little attention to it as possible to resolve it, is simply myopic. Even more so, it’s dangerous because propagating that thinking interferes with preventing the consequences we’ll inevitably have to solve in the near future at much greater cost, both human and financial. With Republican denial, the hazards have only increased in duration and intensity and I wonder if, as a country, we can survive the lack of fiscal morality that’s been displayed so far.

So-called financial conservatives are failing to make decisions in the best interest of the general public to mitigate the risks that are expected to be fulfilled in the future. Nothing we deal with today lasts forever. Everything we know and have contact with will wear out, erode, fracture, break down, stop working, and just die. The only thing we can do is to take care of it long enough so we don’t become its victims. If we can’t, or won’t, take care of infrastructure, replace it with something better. Somehow, the wealthy are able to get better service from Republican politicians than the rest of us. Instead, we the people are left behind to clean up after the roads buckle from heat and water resources get plagued with “colorful” algae blooms (if there’ll be any water available at all).

The Republican policy to minimize the risk while remaining reluctant to protect citizens is disturbing. Supporting a platform to cause self-harm is beyond comprehension. The addiction to short term gains blinds these elected “representatives” and their supporters to the magnitude of the losses that will need to be repaid. The most recent tragedy with the condominium collapse in Surfside, Florida is just another example of ignoring the consequences in favor of inaction.

How many catastrophes will it take before we all realize that policies need to be in place to make the best use of resources before disaster strikes? A simple analogy comes to mind: Do you make a habit of changing the oil in your car before or after the engine blows up? If infrastructure had a dashboard with a warning light, would we be ignoring it then too? As a matter of fact, that’s exactly what’s happening.

Stacy Briley
Zion Crossroads

This letter was previously published in the latest edition of the Central Virginian newspaper and is reprinted here with the author’s permission. 

Money shouldn’t be all that talks in politics

Should the people with the most money get to make the laws in Virginia?

There’s a cycle. In order to write laws, legislators need to be elected. They need money to get elected. It’s often the one with the most money that gets elected because they are able to get their name before more people. The corporations and industry lobbyists who give them money ask for laws that favor their business dealings in return.

The legislators say they don’t let these large campaign con-tributions influence their lawmaking, but how can you believe that? If they were not impacting legislation, why would they give candidates money?

Who is giving candidates money in Virginia? The candidates for the 56th district of the General Assembly show a marked contrast. From his own campaign finance reporting we see that John McGuire has taken in a considerable amount in donations from Dominion Energy and industry lobbying groups, such as the auto dealers association and beer wholesalers.

His opponent, Blakely Lockhart, on the other hand, is relying on small donations from ordinary people, and has pledged to refuse donations from Dominion.

Whose interests will be represented when bills are proposed and voted on? I want our lawmakers to work together to solve our problems without being under pressure to satisfy the demands of large donors.

Mary Kranz
Louisa

This letter was previously published in the latest edition of the Central Virginian newspaper and is reprinted here with the author’s permission. 

Frustrated with Supervisors

The Louisa County Board of Supervisors has demonstrated its inability to pursue the stated core value of stewardship in a number of ways. I expect it will continue on the path of spoiling and destroying the county’s resources to chase down the mythical beast called economic development. It’s likely that the quality for thinking ahead has never been a strong requirement to serve on the board. Otherwise, we would’ve had results better than we’ve seen.

Before going too far, let me clarify that the county’s resources include not only natural resources, but also tax dollars and the citizens that pay them. The supervisors have seen fit to lay waste to these categories. And, I’ll apologize if I missed some details along the way, but in general, Louisa County citizens have to pay closer attention to, and prioritize, those resources that are especially significant. In my opinion, that would be water.

Right now, it’s being squandered in the name of a promised economic
development that may likely not happen. At least not without placing
an excessive burden on the citizens. It wasn’t that long ago that the supervisors claimed to have hearings about the level of groundwater relative to Spring Creek.

Dr. Nick Evans, a recognized expert in hydrogeology, presented an understandable analytical explanation of the potential risks to the groundwater in the county. The supervisors obviously ignored that report – easy enough to to if it hadn’t been read – in favor of a more familiar “disunderstanding” offered by Pam Baughman, Louisa County Water Authority general manager. Despite her lack of technical expertise, the supervisors allowed her to make the defense for development anyway.

On May 20 of this year, The Central Virginian posted a warning on its Facebook page to run both the cold and hot water, until it was clear. There were no other details I could find about this incident but it should be counted as one indicator, among many, that the stewardship by the supervisors, foresight in particular, won’t be counted as a feature of a functioning board.

We have droughts and oppressive heat in other parts of the country. Around the world, actually. Somehow, the supervisors must’ve deliberated and voted that Louisa County is an exclusion zone from the perils of the rest of the world. That’s not only negligence, but arrogance as well.

The Nestle Company diverted water from the local citizens’ water supply in Michigan to operate its water bottling plant. The concern was focused on environmental impact of the water withdrawals and the impact of privatizing water resources.

The Bechtel Company devised a scheme where the citizens of Bolivia had to pay for rainwater they collected for personal use. This was in 2006. Fortunately, the citizens fought Bechtel and won.

The Timmons Group has been successful in influencing the supervisors to push forward projects that aren’t always in the best interest of Louisa County citizens. I keep waiting to see how long the supervisors persist in abusing the public before there’s an appropriate backlash.

Joe Mikolajczak
Gordonsville

This letter was previously published in the July 8, 2021 edition of the Central Virginian newspaper and is reprinted here with the author’s permission.