Seeking a smooth transition to end 2020

American voters’ support for democracy in this election was overwhelming. Joe Biden received almost 5.8 million more popular votes than did Donald Trump, the most votes for any presidential candidate ever. Biden’s Electoral College margin, 306 to 232, is the same as Trump’s in 2016. At the time, Trump called that a “landslide.”

One of the strongest traditions in a stable democracy is a smooth, transparent transition of power. However, the United States, the greatest constitutional democracy in the world, is having problems finding its transitional feet.

President Trump has refused to concede and is falling back on claims of widespread voter fraud, for which there is no evidence. His lawyers have lost 20 of the 21 cases they have filed so far, for a lack of evidence. Attorney General William Barr issued an order that the FBI can investigate when there is evidence, but this is a mere fig leaf to escape Trump’s wrath.

Just last Tuesday night, Trump Twitter-fired Christopher Krebs, his administration’s most senior cybersecurity official responsible for securing the presidential election. The New York Times has reported that Krebs systematically disputed Trump’s unfounded declarations that the presidency was stolen from him through fraudulent ballots and software glitches that changed millions of votes.

As president, almost daily Trump demonstrated that he was devoid of graciousness. Both his tweets and public appearances revealed a taste for insult, an unrelenting boastfulness and arrogance, and a general coarseness.

To this we could add his hyperbole, his lies, and his want of generosity. My Depression-era mother taught me that there is always a role for courtesy. She also taught that a person’s reputation is a precious commodity and that lying and cheating quickly dissolve the respect one can hope to receive.

Some Republican governors and legislators are beginning to acknowledge that Biden won the election and that the country should move on, recognizing that a transparent and orderly transition has been the custom in every previous presidential election. Firing the Secretary of Defense, abruptly drawing down our overseas deployments, threatening to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities, and abusing federal employment regulations are dangerous moves and have no place in any lame-duck period between administrations.

Perhaps there is something to the idea that Trump is salting the soil to make governing impossible for Biden, while preparing for his own political and financial comeback. Claims of election fraud seek to delegitimize the elected president and end up reducing respect for the Constitution. If Republican voters and legislators buy that myth, the effects could be far-reaching for both parties.

Senator McConnell’s pledge to make President Obama a one-term president may be on rewind. In fulfilling this pledge, McConnell gave us legislative gridlock. Hundreds of bipartisan House bills have been forwarded to the Senate, where they piled up and died, and will have to be re-legislated starting in January. What better demonstrates the GOP-controlled Senate’s lack of commitment to the general welfare?

Trump’s refusal to allow an orderly transition is exacerbating the consequences of his mishandling of the pandemic, stalling the economic recovery, and endangering our national security. Nevertheless, Biden’s response has been to soldier on in the face of these obstacles and put together his administration. As we watch this unfold, perhaps we will have a greater appreciation for the motto, “Keep Calm and Carry On.”

On this date in 1962, President Kennedy was assassinated. His administration committed itself to the hope and promise of America. Let us rededicate ourselves to that vision. January 20, 2021—Inauguration Day—cannot get here too soon.

[Reuther] Seeking a smooth transition to end 2020

TRUMP GETS WRONG RESULTS

I’m looking forward to relief from the constant barrage of real “fake” news and insults from the Trump Administration. The Mainstream Media, which has been under attack for doing what it can to provide accurate news, may finally be rid of its 1st Amendment oppressor. This country doesn’t need to be lied to. Its voice doesn’t need to be ignored. But that’s exactly what’s been happening with daily blare of noise from the White House.

If Trump could accomplish anything, it should be to leave office quietly and never be heard from again. For the last four years, this country has suffered over 20,000 lies and misleading statements. This was reported by the Washington Post. McSweeneys.net has catalogued almost 300 pages of Trump’s cruelties, collusions, corruptions, and crimes. On October 20, 2020, Dana Milbank of the Washington Post also listed 41 items that presented a more than adequate case to VOTE – but not for Trump!!

The previous references aren’t exhaustive. Any credible media source will likely offer the same kind of information based on investigative reporting. Probably the biggest fear of someone who habitually and easily lies, is to be exposed with facts. We should all fear the propaganda bombardment, not just from the source, but also from the echo chambers.

It seems that Dan Braswell may have relied on Trump’s Twitter feed instead of researching reliable sources for information. If he’d done that research conscientiously, he would’ve had a list completely different from what he presented. In fact, Braswell never mentioned:

· Putin’s bounty on American soldiers without any admonishment from Trump.

· Trump’s belittling of the “Suckers and Losers” in our armed forces, like John McCain who was a prisoner of war in Vietnam. That was the war Trump avoided because of a bone spur handicap.

· Trump’s dismantling of the EPA website of Climate Change data and information because it doesn’t suit his agenda.

· Trump’s foot-dragging at the start of the “China virus” that led to over 220,000 American lives being lost. Injecting bleach and ingesting hydroxychloroquine were being touted as the cure for COVID-19. (And no one really calls it the “China virus” except Trump.)

· Trump secretly funneling money from a charitable organization into his own bank account.

· Trump’s excuses about the tax cut that was really to benefit the rich while the middle class will be waiting to feel the impact. The disparity between wealth and income continues.

Doesn’t anyone pay attention to this kind of information, understand it, and know how to act on it?

For all of Braswell’s past LTEs, the most recent is the worst portrayal of misinformation and disinformation. This is something that we need to be aware of whenever Braswell’s name appears in print. I’m certainly interested in what he has to say and I’ll be watching closely for his misstatements.

Stacy Lee Briley

Healthcare Worker Supports Spanberger

As a resident of Louisa County, mom of an 11-year old, and provider of Mental health services I am writing to encourage others to join me in supporting Abigail Spanberger representing Viriginia’s 7th Congressional District in the US House or Representatives.

Ms. Spanberger has repeatedly demonstrated her commitment to supporting affordable accessible healthcare for all citizens, including children, senior citizens, and young adults. This has included advocating that coverage remain available for those with pre-existing conditions, as well as for adults 26 years and younger needing to remain on their parent’s plans while they get started on their own.

While Nick Freitas has made vague reference to protecting coverage for those with pre-existing conditions, he has failed to be clear on his plan for maintaining this coverage and has continued to support policies that do not cover pre-existing conditions. Not only has Mr. Freitas voted against Medicaid expansion, Politifact confirmed that his support of short term, inexpensive health policies does not comply with currently requirements to cover pre-existing conditions. Without these protections in place, all of us are at greater risk of difficulty in finding coverage and potentially faced with greater health costs.

It is important to remember that health costs overall are typically reduced for those with insurance coverage. So even though we pay for insurance and may have a co-payment or out of pocket expense for services, the charges are FAR less that they would be if we were not covered by that insurance plan.

It is hard to imagine how difficult it might be to handle the additional stress of paying for medical care for my daughter without insurance. Though generally healthy, she has been impacted by asthma like responses to basic illness and some other medical issues since she was very young. With ready access to doctors, testing and treatment, we have been able to learn about her medical issues and manage them with a limited amount of ongoing medication and treatment. Our insurance has allowed us to access this care at a more affordable rate. To consider the possibility of any child being denied insurance to support their medical needs because of a pre-existing condition is alarming at best. Prevention is far less costly than the intensive or emergency treatments that can come when issues are not identified early and managed pro-actively.

The stressors that greet young adults is often apparent in my work as a mental health provider. For those in their early 20’s access to health insurance can greatly smooth their path. Whether they are using their insurance coverage to access traditional medical care, mental health services, or necessary prescriptions the opportunity to remain on family insurance through age 26 allows young adults to have one less hurdle in establishing themselves as independent.

The concern about access to medical coverage is further heightened as we find ourselves navigating our way through this global pandemic. While it feels like we’ve been living in this COVID-19 lifestyle for way too long, it’s also true that we have yet to learn about the long- term impacts of COVID-19. Will prevalence of pre-exiting conditions grow? We don’t yet know. Costs of any treatment increase with time and severity of condition. Coverage allowing preventive care and early treatment, whether for COVID-19 or other conditions, tends to reduce expenses overall. Protecting access to insurance coverage for those with pre-existing conditions is a reasonable, even critical piece of maintaining a strong and healthy community.

Please consider the importance of access to insurance coverage for those you love. Even if your family is not faced with a pre-existing condition today, there is no way to know that this will remain the case. It’s stressful enough to be worried about the health of someone we love, especially a child. Knowing that insurance coverage is in place to ensure coverage and reduce family costs allows us to worry less about the money and focus more on supporting the people we love.

A vote for Abigail Spanberger will help to ensure that your family will be protected should something unexpected arise.

Ann Tourangeau
Louisa

[CV]

Let local firm compete for fiber

I have fiber-optic cable to my home. I get continual high-speed broadband service. And, I live in Louisa County.

I didn’t get this wonderful service from the Louisa County Board of Supervisors. I got it from iWiSP. They approached my property owners’ association with an offer to provide fiber to the home to all our members for $75 a month at a minimum of 30 megabits per second, with no limits, caps or hidden costs.

iWiSP came to us years ago and provided the only wireless internet service on the Louisa side of Lake Anna. Wireless was not without its difficulties (disruption from lightning strikes, storms, leaves on trees, heavy use, etc.) but it was way better than dial-up modems or hot spots (since it was way cheaper). For the past eight years the Louisa County Broadband Authority has been trying to move more citizens into the broadband age, but with limited success.

Now iWiSP is working to complete fiber to the home in our community. Again, we are the first to get this much higher level of service. Another nearby association may piggyback off our services with no reduction of service level for us after it is completely installed.

Will the county be able to convince the electric utilities to offer this service with just $15 million “reserved” for this effort? Rappahannock Electric Cooperative forecasts it would cost $500 million (or more) to provide this to their 12,000 customers. Earlier this summer I listened in on a call with the chief executive officer of REC, who said at that time they had reservations about providing this service except as a carrier along existing routes. Getting to the home was not viewed as part of their strategy, since existing wiring cannot be used and additional fiber-optic cables must be installed from the street to the home.

So, why not get local businesses more involved? Why limit the partnership to just the electric company and the county government? iWiSP operates around Lake Anna. Why not include them in the planning for fiber to the home? I’m loving my fiber-optic internet service. Why shouldn’t more of Louisa County have the same opportunity?

Larry Zemke Mineral

[CV]

All Children do not matter to Freitas

Nick Freitas has thrown his hat into the ring to challenge Congresswoman Spanberger. In his video he states: “My mom always said if somebody needs help, you have a personal responsibility to intervene”. But words are easy to say and harder to back up. Since the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior I looked into his voting record to see what his priorities might be. Mr. Freitas was one of only two who voted against SB423 requiring health insurance companies to cover the cost of hearing aids for children. 91 other legislators voted in favor of the bipartisan bill. Trouble hearing can be detected at a young age and even babies can be fitted with behind-the-ear aids. Children with hearing loss may have trouble developing speech, social skills, and have trouble learning. Does Mr. Freitas not understand basic child development? There is a critical period, up to age 5 where a child can develop language and after that it becomes much more difficult. Did he consult with any pediatricians before he voted? How is denying children healthcare helpful? Mr. Freitas intervened, but not on behalf of the children in need of help.

In his video he further stated “My dad really instilled in me that you have an obligation to protect people who can’t protect themselves”. Mr. Freitas was the only one who voted against requiring health insurance companies to cover the cost of diagnosis and treatment of autism (HB 1503). 97 other legislators voted in favor of the bipartisan bill. The range and severity of symptoms of autism varies greatly and early expert evaluation is necessary. Difficulty with communication, social interactions, repetitive behaviors, anxiety and sensory issues are just some of the symptoms families manage. Does Mr. Freitas not understand that autism is a lifelong condition? Common sense tells us that addressing a problem early results in a better outcome and research proves this to be true. Mr. Freitas failed to protect people who can’t protect themselves.

So who is he intervening for? Who is he protecting? These votes suggest that he is protecting for profit health insurance companies. Does he oppose services for all children with disabilities or just these two? I have spent my entire career advocating for children with disabilities and it is rare to find a politician so extreme and heartless about denying services to children who need them. I am thankful that he was overwhelmingly outvoted both times by a bipartisan legislature. Mr. Freitas does not act in accordance with his words and cannot be trusted to act in the best interest of the people.

In contrast, the incumbent, Congresswoman Spanberger has voted as she said she would. She has voted to support the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and Medicaid expansion, both of which we have here in Virginia. She cosponsored and passed legislation to lower the costs of prescription drugs. We need a representative who works to benefit people, not health insurance corporations who earned $913 Billion in profits in 2019. Vote for all children, vote for Spanberger.

Aleta Strickland
Licensed School Psychologist

[CV]

Nick Freitas Doesn’t Want Us to Have Broadband

If you had the chance to vote to increase access to high speed Internet (broadband service) in rural areas, right here in Louisa, would you vote yes or no? Nearly everyone I know would vote YES on such a measure. They would vote for it because broadband is so important for our jobs, education, entertainment, shopping and other everyday activities

Nick Freitas had that chance and he voted NO. He was one of only 6 members of the House of Delegates to vote against House Bill 831. He has voted against broadband numerous times. It’s been made clear by his actions; Delegate Nick Freitas doesn’t think it’s important for us to have broadband.

Abigail Spanberger, our US Congresswoman, listens to her constituents and has taken every step she can to get us reliable, high-speed internet. She helped introduce the Moving America Forward Act, which includes the Accessible, Affordable Internet for All Act. She has worked tirelessly to bring funding to ReConnect, the USDA program designed to bring the Internet we need to the rural counties she serves. She recently led a successful bipartisan effort to increase that funding by 78%. Abigail Spanberger very much wants us to have high speed Internet.

Spanberger’s opponent in her run for reelection this November is Nick Freitas, who currently represents the 30th district in the Virginia General Assembly. Freitas doesn’t want us to have broadband Internet. So, I don’t want him to have a position in Congress.

Sincerely

Jim Wolf
Louisa

[CV]Frietas Doesn’t Support Broadband